View Single Post
  #19  
Old 06-30-2018, 09:14 PM
brianpatrick's Avatar
brianpatrick (Online)
Still Clicking!
Official Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,297
Thanks: 428
Thanks 1,185
Default

Originally Posted by Mohican View Post
Who is propagating this idea that the sun's output is constant? And that the sun doesn't contribute to a changing climate?



If there was not solar involvement then the earth wouldn't receive radiant heat from the sun.



Solar output is cyclical. That is why people could, prior to modern instruments still track sun spot activity and predict long term weather patterns.



How does the sun produce heat/energy/light? It does it through nuclear fusion, via a hydrogen to helium conversion.



Other things change outside of man's control. The earth sometimes experiences "wobble" on its axis, it's orbit isn't always exact. The continents experience some drift - which could/would change the amount of heat the land absorbs.



Imagine having several large volcanic events. By the logic of the CO2 - global warming theorist, the extra CO2 should make the earth hotter? In 1816, North America and much of the world experienced a volcanic winter. The haze (and extra CO2) didn't absorb heat from the sun, but blocked it. There was summer pond ice as far south as Pennsylvania....


Letís say, for the sake of argument that 97% of scientists are wrong (or on the payroll), and man is not contributing to global warming. What then? Donít we still have to find a solution? Or... we could not do anything and allow a lot of people to die, and witness mass migrations like the world has never seen.

Is that maybe just part of Godís plan? Iíve heard there are people who like strife in the Middle East because the Bible says thatís where it will all end. Youíre not one of those guys are you?
Reply With Quote